Comments on: Moving on up a grade… https://shepline.com/2003/10/10/moving-on-up-a-grade/ author | illustrator | digital designer Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:38:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4 By: acrolinz https://shepline.com/2003/10/10/moving-on-up-a-grade/#comment-362 Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:38:04 +0000 http://journal.shepline.com/?p=223#comment-362 In reply to Thomas.

9 or 10 is not bad at all…all it means is that a 10th grader should be able to read your journal. It’s based on wordiness and word length. It would be too wordy or too many big words for younger kids.

]]>
By: Thomas https://shepline.com/2003/10/10/moving-on-up-a-grade/#comment-361 Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:28:38 +0000 http://journal.shepline.com/?p=223#comment-361 In reply to acrolinz.

No, I think I’m still with you. So it seems that me and most of journal friends are writing (if this meme is to be believed?) posts that have a reading of about Grades 9 or 10… Hrmm…

]]>
By: acrolinz https://shepline.com/2003/10/10/moving-on-up-a-grade/#comment-360 Fri, 10 Oct 2003 15:27:43 +0000 http://journal.shepline.com/?p=223#comment-360 Based on the US public school system, I think…

But if you look inside almost any children’s book, where they have all copyright info, they list the reading level, and it looks like “RL:6” or “RL:6.6”
RL:6 indicates that the technical side of the writing is about a 6th grade reading level (11-year-old student) It doesn’t take into account content, so some books also indicate if the content is suggustive of older readers. I typically found though, that books at my RL were to hard…I was reading mostly 2nd and 3rd grade RL books when I was in 4th grade and mostly 4th and 5th grade books when I was in sixth.

Does this make more sense now, or did I just confuse you?

]]>